Facts About case law on status quo on transfer of legal shares Revealed
Facts About case law on status quo on transfer of legal shares Revealed
Blog Article
As being the Supreme Court will be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has long been reached, therefore the decision on the Supreme Court needs to become taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) of the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
A lessen court might not rule against a binding precedent, regardless of whether it feels that it is actually unjust; it might only express the hope that a higher court or perhaps the legislature will reform the rule in question. Should the court thinks that developments or trends in legal reasoning render the precedent unhelpful, and desires to evade it and help the law evolve, it may either hold that the precedent is inconsistent with subsequent authority, or that it should be distinguished by some material difference between the facts in the cases; some jurisdictions allow for just a judge to recommend that an appeal be completed.
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. five/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI 46 SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have listened to the figured out counsel for your parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments since the issues of the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard towards the interim relief application in terms of Section seven(1) on the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 handy over possession in the subjected premises to the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs for being decided because of the competent court after hearing the parties if pending as the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer from the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court needs to see this element for interim custody of the topic premises When the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order.
The lots of this power casts an obligation around the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for any crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. However it's made distinct that police is free to choose action against any person that's indulged in criminal activities subject matter to legislation. 8. The DIGP concerned is directed to prioritize this matter and, after hearing both parties within two months, address the alleged police misconduct. If your officials are found culpable, departmental proceedings for their punishment must be initiated, plus they shall be assigned non-area duties during the interim period. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 113 Order Date: 08-APR-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
For that more info reason, the petition and any related applications are dismissed. The Petitioner needs to go after his remedy through an appeal before the competent authority. If this kind of an appeal has not but been decided, it should be addressed. Following that decision, the Petitioner may well then look for further recourse before the Service Tribunal. Read more
Though there is no prohibition against referring to case legislation from a state other than the state in which the case is being read, it holds little sway. Still, if there isn't any precedent from the home state, relevant case regulation from another state could be viewed as from the court.
Apart from the rules of procedure for precedent, the load presented to any reported judgment may perhaps count on the reputation of both the reporter as well as the judges.[7]
eleven . Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Primarily, this is usually a free and democratic state, and once a person becomes a major he or she can marry whosoever he/she likes; In the event the parents with the boy or girl tend not to approve of such inter-caste or interreligious marriage the maximum they're able to do if they will Lower off social relations with the son or even the daughter, Nonetheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes such inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or girl who's major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or gentleman that is a major, the pair is neither harassed by any one nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who provides these types of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to task by instituting criminal proceedings through the police against this sort of persons and further stern action is taken against this sort of person(s) as provided by legislation.
Some bodies are supplied statutory powers to issue steerage with persuasive authority or similar statutory effect, like the Highway Code.
Binding Precedent – A rule or principle set up by a court, which other courts are obligated to abide by.
12 . Const. P. 245/2025 (S.B.) Qurban Ali S/o Qasim V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The legislation enjoins the police for being scrupulously fair for the offender along with the Magistracy is to make sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court and from other courts Nevertheless they have didn't have any corrective effect on it.
If granted absolute immunity, the parties would not only be protected from liability during the matter, but couldn't be answerable in almost any way for their actions. When the court delayed making this kind of ruling, the defendants took their request into the appellate court.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy on the information contained on this site, or the information linked to about the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can create inaccuracies. You should read the full case before depending on it for legal research purposes.
Summaries supply a condensed overview of offences and their penalties, and the procedural facets of prosecuting and punishing individuals accused of committing crimes.